Making A Mockery of Real Rape Victims

elizabethjaycee I’m really not sure where to start with this post. Having just spent the past couple of hours reading through Jean Malkovsy’s excellent analysis of The Girl: Geimer’s “Memoir” over at his excellent site Roman Polanski: The Ballad of Contradictions, a link that can be found to the right in the blogroll, I have come to the conclusion that Geimer has either slipped into some sort of alternative timeline or she’s completely lost her mind. Why? From the excerpts I’ve read (I refuse to buy the book since it might just damage my mental stability) over at Jean’s site, I can absolutely say she’s certifiable. As are her two co-writers, her lawyer Lawrence Silver, and ghost writer (and I’m not talking Polanski’s film) Judith Newman. See it seems all three have engaged in some kind of alternative history writing here. I read this analysis aloud to my significant other and adopted a rather patronizing voice when I read those portions that came from Geimer’s narrative. Why? Because I don’t find her the least bit credible. When I think of books where rape was discussed as a reality and with far more credibility than Geimer, I think of My Story by Elizabeth Smart and A Stolen Life by Jaycee Lee Dugard, both ladies who know what it is like to be raped and be in fear and danger for their lives. Having read these two books from cover to cover I can say I’m utterly amazed at the candor and strength of both young ladies. Unlike Geimer who cannot seem to find it within herself to tell the truth in her book.

The story Samantha Geimer tells is unbelievable. Unbelievable in the way that it fails to tell the truth of what actually happened and that all known facts including the forensic evidence comport with Polanski’s version of the events. Geimer likes to whitewash both her conduct as well as her mother’s in terms of making it seem as though they were mere victims of Polanski’s machinations. What she does not or will not allow herself is to admit what was evident: She and her mother were and still are born liars. What is astonishing is she fails to note that the impetus behind the writing of this book is the fact that Polanski can not discuss the events of that March afternoon without breaking the terms of the civil suit. Fortunately he did get his side of the story out in his autobiography that again, comports with the evidence. Samantha Geimer and Susan Gailey are nothing short of opportunists who parlayed a one night stand into a 34 year career. Seems according to Geimer’s 18 year-old boyfriend, Steve Kronblet, Samantha likes to play the actress. This is something she excels at…being just like her dear old mom who allowed drugs around her at a very young age as well as allowing her to drink at a young age, then cried rape when it was convenient in light of a failed attempt to gain an agent from Polanski. So they became vindictive. For those who believe I’m being harsh, I say this…the contents of this book are shocking how much she contradicts herself from her past statements. Having seen most of her television interviews as well as read most of what she’s said in the press since she ‘came out’ as Polanski’s ‘victim’, this book contradicts everything else she’s said. Only now is she calling it rape, an attempt from her co-author Lawrence Silver to gain the upper hand in the eyes of those who don’t know her proclivity to lie. Up until this tome she’s called it “only sex.” Only rape in the way of the Statutory element of the crime. However, she now calls it rape to not only sully Roman Polanski’s name further, but to also engender a knee jerk response from those in the public who have no doubt also failed to comport themselves with the truth. For anyone wishing to read the truth of this incident and a complete analysis of Geimer’s lies, one can turn to Jean’s blog for the facts of the case.

Hey, why not read through the entire blog. It’s full of the actual evidence, has transcripts and the analysis done on Polanski by the prison psychiatrist as well as the probation report who in turn, put some of the blame on the permissiveness within the Gailey home as a reason why this event came to be. Please do not be fooled by the ‘explosive’ content in this book. It is neither the truth nor is it her story. It is her concocted story. A bunch of fake slight of hand to try to explain away why she and her mother were not charged with perjury. Her’s is not the truth. The truth lies within the better written Roman by Polanski where he tells the truth. Pick up that book then read through the evidence at the blog above and then come back and call Samantha Geimer and Susan Gailey what they are: Liars.

She calls herself a survivor. What hubris. She cannot begin to know what it is actually like to be a survivor. What happened that afternoon cannot even be called a crime. That she writes to rape victims is a travesty. She makes a mockery of actual rape. My only wish for her is she would take the money she won in the civil settlement from Polanski and go quietly into that good night because compared to the stories of Elizabeth Smart, Jaycee Lee Dugard and Elizabeth Fritzl, Samantha Geimer’s is nothing but a need to continue that fifteen minutes of fame she and her mother began back in March 1977. All I can say to her is, get off the stage already! Enough is enough already. You’ve milked this story for everything you can, now just shut up and go! For someone who supposedly didn’t want to come forward or to have all this noteriety through it, she sure is in need of the fame. Why? Failed to become the actress she wanted. Polanski didn’t give her and her mother what they wanted and that was the entrance into the Natassja Kinski world of the starlet. Ever thought you weren’t worthy? It also surprises me when I see her posing for photos in such periodicals as People and such, she poses like a failed actress still believing she has a shot at some sort of stardom. Interesting that she uses Polanski’s photos within the book as well as on the cover. Technically it’s child pornography. These images should not have been seen due to the nature of their capturing. They are also part of a continuing litigation in terms of the ongoing criminal case against Polanski still snaking its way through the California Criminal Courts. Even that doesn’t stop her. Yet she feels perfectly fine in using those photos for her own financial gain. Another reason I despise her. Again it’s perfectly fine for her to exploit Polanski within the pages of this book, yet Polanski told the truth in his book and she and her mother sued him. But hey there Sammy, feel free to continue to exploit Polanski and your own idiocy. I won’t even post a photo of the book’s cover. That’s saying I give her some kind of relevancy alongside those books of Elizabeth Smart and Jaycee Lee Dugard. Both books are haunting in how they describe in detail the abuse and degradation they went through with their captors. k

And here is the other thing that just sticks in my craw about Geimer’s “tell all”, she claims she felt she wasn’t free to go! Yet Polanski drove her home! We are supposed to believe about Polanski that after having his way with her, he just drove this ‘poor girl’ home when she was bleeding and raped? Considering what I believe happened that afternoon at Jack Nicholson’s house and the aftermath in terms of her Grand Jury testimony regarding her actions afterward, she went home and sat in the product of a rape? She sat in her underwear with Polanski’s ejaculate, and in her words, “up the back,” this says something more about Geimer: She’s creative, yet not correct. There was no ejaculate “up the back” as she states. There were no fluids present where she says there should have been. There was only the stain in the gusset that has been tested to prove it came from a sterile man. I’d like to know if Boyfriend Bob was sterile. If wishes were horses, I’d love to have a whack at that stain. Obtain buccal swabs of Boyfriend Bob, Steve Kronblet and any other man she was having sex with including Polanski and have at an actual DNA analysis of whose stain that belonged to. If the answer is different than Polanski, then we need to turn our scorn on Geimer and Gailey for perpetrating a most egregious crime. Egregious in the amount of vitriol that has been levied at Polanski these many years since Geimer came into the collective consciousness. Turn that back on the Geimer/Gailey team and call them out for the lies they’ve told and continue to tell. Tell them they are not allowed to profit off of Polanski. Tell them they are perpetrators of the worst form of smut. Tell them to just shut up and leave the stage. Tell them they are not allowed to take the same stage as Elizabeth Smart or Jaycee Lee Dugard because what they endured for months, in Elizabeth’s case, and years, in Jaycee’s, and call themselves anything close to survivors. That word is reserved for those of us who actually want to see those to hurt us be punished for what they did. Not be all wishy-washy about when to call Polanski a victim or a perpetrator, because certainly the former applies.

In closing I’d like to put out a personal plea to Samantha Geimer. That is, stop it already! Stop trying to call yourself something you’re not. Stop believing you can even stand alongside those of us who want our victimizers imprisoned. We don’t want riches, we want actual cold hard justice. What you want is stardom. Well you got it. Time to go quietly into that good night. Time to pack it up and close the doors on that expensive piece of real estate in Hawaii and just be a quiet citizen because I know for a fact, when Roman Polanski passes into that great beyond, you’ll drag your sorry ass back into the limelight and comment on his passing. And for that I’ll renew my hatred of you. I know I’ll want to throw a shoe or the remote control at the television or ram my fist through the screen of my computer for how positively narcissistic you are to believe you deserve to stand on that stage once more. So do me a favour Sammy, just don’t. In all that holy, just don’t!

9 Replies to “Making A Mockery of Real Rape Victims”

    1. Dede:

      I have venom only for those women who accuse men falsely of rape. Remember, all six felony counts were dropped against Polanski. He was not charged with rape, unlike Glitter and Kelly who have multiple counts of rape against them. I do hope that you believe that once you serve your time, you’re allowed that freedom? Seems everyone but Roman Polanski.

  1. Great post. I was one of the many people are who thought that Polanski was a pedophiliac rapist. But I began yo become suspicious when geimer said she forgave Polanski and wanted all charges droppest against him because she was being harassed by the media about “the rape”. Why would a rape victim want a rapist to go free? Wouldn’t being harassed by the media make them want to put the rapist in jail even more. After all it was the rapist that caused this, would you want revenge for being humiliated like that?

    If she hated the media attention to her, then why did she willingly go on Larry Fucking King and talk about the rape?

    This all led me to do a little reasearch on the case. I later found out that geimer was a liar. She was never raped.

    I’m glad someone is speaking the truth.

    1. Annie:

      Thank you so much for your comment. Finally someone is seeing the truth of the Geimer/Gailey liar tag team for who they are. And I agree with you about why a rape victim would want the charges against their supposed rapist dropped. It does not make a lick of sense. When you see her on television or read through her many interviews it’s rife with lies and think of what she’s doing to those of us who have been raped, it’s a travesty. I only wish more would be like you and see her for what she is.

      Thanks for stopping by.

  2. This case made me realize that underage girls sometimes cry rape after having consensual sex with older men either to gain money or just to save face.

    I don’t know which pisses me off more; actual rapists or bitches who make false rape allegations (which cheapens rape and make life even harder for real rape victims and ruin innocent lives)

    I think Sammy likes the media attention. If she didn’t she would just have stfu , live a quiet life and maybe change her name. Her going on TV and complaining about the media and talking about the so called rape is just a passive aggressive way of gaining more attention.

    There are times I wonder does sammy want the charges against Polanski dropped out of subconscious guilt or is it just because she doesn’t want to be outed as a lying bitch (in case of a retrial).

    1. Annie:

      Sing it sister! My problem with this case is that Samantha wants her cake and eat it too. She wants to be a “rape” victim, but she also wants Roman Polanski as a notch in her bedpost. My firm belief is that she wants to say what really happened, but if she does she’ll be considered a money grubbing bitch.

      Samantha’s claim to fame definitely is being Roman Polanski’s one-night-stand that lasted 30+ years. That she chronically states she wants the media to leave her alone, then goes on television — like you said — and writes books about her sexual conquests flies in the face of that contention. I personally don’t think she or her mother know the truth anymore. They just like the publicity.

      Thanks again for your wonderful insight.

  3. I still haven’t read Geimer’s fantasy novel and I certainly won’t spend a penny on it, but I know she changed her tune way too often over the yrs and now calling it outright rape is indeed a false rape accusation by definition. Funny how someone called me a radfem suddenly because I defended RP and called out Geimer, Lewis and Vogelhut as ACTUAL FRAs, just because he thinks RP is not their victim, or of false rape accusations, or that OF radfems ( https://novalislore.wordpress.com/2010/07/11/roman-polanski-the-art-of-false-rape-accusations/#comment-8060 ) Never heard such illogical bull in a long while. Laughable. Like Geimer’s latest ‘rape’ rhetoric.

    1. Novalis:

      Don’t worry, neither will I. I know Jean at Oddmanout bought it and did an excellent analysis of it and I love that he has so collapsed her fiction. I think it’s disgusting that she gets to call it rape, yet Roman is forbidden by the provisions of the civil suit to say anything to refute her. As far as the “radical feminism” I’m so tired of it all. That we cannot get it through our heads that women are lying about being raped every day. All we have to do is look at the current Cosby case. We have over 50 women who at least half of them cannot be believed, and a further quarter of them have nothing but a “He touched me” allegation. Yet we’ve all jumped on that Hillary Clinton balls to the wall attitude.

  4. I read what Jean has compiled and analysed from her fantasy piece as indeed always brilliantly and that alone should prove that Geimer & Co are nothing but blatant liars, exploiting RP to his dying day we always maintained they had, and they all sadly got away with it. I’m not too familiar with the Cosby case bar the bare bones, but what I did see, points to indeed another case of fame-grabbing cry rapers. Just like the Cliff Richard allegations, that oh so suddenly vanished again. And then of course we have the ongoing Assange case, which was and still is MORE than obviously another case of false rape persecution, where HC has no doubt a few dirty fingers in it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *