I really debated whether I’d make this post but considering the rampant malignancy that is a certain other IMDB poster, I thought it was time. Yeah another poster on that board who is in serious need for a time out. This poster’s name is Justanicknamed. Why name him? Simple, because he is quite plainly one of the most disgusting and deplorable people I’ve ever come across. And that word is more than apropos due to his rampant love of none other than President Pussy Grabber and known White Supremacist, Donald J. Trump. This person voted for this piece of excrement. So I guess in the end, that makes Numby, as we call him on the board, just as much a piece of excrement. Truth hurts when it hits you in the face. I guess that in the end Numby like so many others are in that “basket of deplorables” that Hillary Clinton mentioned of Trump’s supporters/voters. Numby is one of those types that no matter what you tell him he won’t believe it because those voices in his head are telling him something else, doesn’t matter if there is proof/facts on your side. He’s like Trump who invents stuff so that he can appear to have the upper hand. Problem is, he just comes off looking like a stupid petulant dope who like Jon Snow, knows nothing. Numby posts often as many times as a couple dozen times in a day to the Polanski board, and in each posting he will haul off and call anyone any number of disgusting and dehumanizing names all because he has no off switch or ethical compass. Anyone is open for his ridicule no matter how many times one tries to be civil with him. And believe me I tried to be. With anyone on that board I try to be civil. I try to be as informative as I can, providing as much information as I can to allow he and others to acquit themselves of the facts. However, this person blatantly refuses to accept anything you give him. He chooses to ignore the facts and instead brings up things that were not a part of the case but then hammers those home, even to the extent of making stuff up.
So why this post? To show how clearly deluded these people are. In this new age where facts are somehow wrong and or not facts, and of fake news, it’s no wonder Numby and his ilk have trouble with facts. They believe that it’s perfectly fine to use disgusting epithets to describe you, even urging others to do the same. Numby claims to be a supporter of rape victims. When I pointed out that I was a victim of rape, he then went on to say he was happy I was raped and that I likely enjoyed it. This is the kind of crap that is acceptable these days. Now under Trump they are emboldened by his behaviour. Numby even said something like he hoped I had blood dripping from my vagina, that’s how virulent his strain is. And again I say that this is the “new normal” where Trumpers (might as well call them what they are and in counter to the birthers and their nonsense toward President Barack Obama) feel as if they have the right to have this crap spew out of their pie holes and no one will call them out on what they’ve said or that what they’ve said is not the truth. One such thing Numby refuses to understand is that the photos Roman Polanski took of Samantha Geimer on that afternoon in March 1977, were not part of the original six felony counts he faced after being arrested. Those original six counts were:
- rape by use of drugs
- lewd and lascivious act upon a child under 14
- furnishing a controlled substance to a minor
Does anyone see a charge on the photos? Interestingly all those were reduced to one count of unlawful sexual intercourse with a minor, a misdemeanor down from six felony counts. At no point was he ever charged with child pornography for having taken the photos. It should be noted that Samantha Geimer has possession of those photos. Some of them appeared in her book, including one on the cover taken by Polanski. So those photos must not have been so traumatic that she can look at them and have them in her book. It’s shocking that she wants to look at them, but then we all know she’s not really disturbed by them. They were taken by one of the most celebrated of film directors. Someone she could never have expected to ever cross paths. But those photos were not part of the original charges no matter how many times Numby wants to say it does not make it so. But Numby likes to have his fiction to cling to.
I suspect this type of revisionisism will get progressively worse as the next four years go on. Trumpers will get more and more emboldened by believing that Trump “has their backs” even though if the going gets tough, he’ll abandon them just as readily as he has everyone else who he’s become pissed off with. He’s already doing that now.
Numby has had plenty of time to bone up on the facts of the Polanski case. This author has provided more than enough links on it to sink the Titanic a few times over. Those links include some in the sidebar. Novalis Lore, Jean Malkovsky, my own work here…. Those all have the truth on the case including Jean’s in-depth analysis of Samantha Geimer’s chronic mind lapses as to what she’s said before and now about the events of that afternoon. Then there is Jean’s analysis of Geimer’s book, that travesty of the truth where she again uses her oft-told lies and half-truths to extol her own “trauma” but then spews out her own sexual prowess and how she was basically a slut. Even the pleading of her own father didn’t change her. But she never really puts that blame on Polanski. Oh she says that her life changed after him, but she never has any concrete proof it was any different afterwards than it was before. She still exercised her autonomy in terms of her sleeping around. She chronicles how her mother would drop her off at the back door of her school, where she would then exit the front door with her good friend, catching the bus to go back to the friend’s house do drugs and sleep with guys. So what was new here? She was doing the exact same thing before Polanski. So nothing Polanski did had any impact on her whatsoever, with the exception that she was more famous. And even that she has issues with. Isn’t that what she wanted? Didn’t she want to become famous? Wasn’t that what her book was for? To give her that podium to “share her story”? The most disgusting thing about her is how she says she has called up rape victims to offer support, and this doesn’t in the least cause anyone to gasp? And this is the thing Numby and his ilk refuse to believe, that this is what Geimer wanted all a long. If you look at her when she appears on the various interview shows she does, and or magazine articles, she poses with that same smirk she always has. The one that tells she knows she has Roman Polanski as a notch in her bedpost. And that same smirk I want to just punch out of her. But Numby and his ilk believe her, believes the lies being told about Polanski by the red press, and often times these people make stuff up to make him more a monster because of those voices in their heads. And this I suspect is the result. Like his blind devotion to Trump, I believe that Numby truly believes what he’s saying, despite the fact that nothing that comes out of his mouth is the truth. Just another keyboard warrior without a sword to wield or a cause to champion, because face it, there is no damsel in distress here. Geimer has more or less told them they’re not needed in the discussion, but then like Trump, she does an about-face then wants them to believe her when it supposedly counts.
But then it doesn’t really count because she’s openly campaigned for Polanski’s full exoneration. She’s written two letters of congratulations to the Swiss and Polish justices who found no cause to extradite Polanski back to the United States. Here in this letter I’m reproducing under Fair Use, she writes to the current District Attorney Jackie Lacy who is the acolyte of Steve Cooley:
January 24, 2014
RE: The State of California vs Roman Polanski & Roman Raymond Polanski vs The Superior Court of Los Angeles
District Attorney Lacey:
Allow me to introduce myself. I am Samantha Geimer, the minor victim involved in the Roman Polanski sexual assault case. I write you to request that your office commence an official investigation into the alleged misconduct occurring in 1977 and 1978 during proceedings in The State of California vs Roman Polanski. As the minor victim in this case any misconduct which may have occurred impacts me directly. More importantly the fundamental fairness and justice in our criminal justice system is paramount above the individual concerns of the defendant and I or the State of California’s interest in prosecuting a case.
In Section VIII. Conclusion, of the Dec. 21, 2009, Opinion of the Second Appellate Court of Appeal of the State of California, Second Appellate District, it is stated that the Court remains deeply concerned that these allegations of misconduct have not been addressed. Further, “Polanski’s allegations urgently require full exploration and then, if indicated, curative action for the abuses alleged here. Time continues to pass, and the delay in addressing this matter has already removed one participant from the ranks of the available witnesses for an evidentiary hearing on the judicial and prosecutorial misdeeds that have been alleged here. The passage of more time before this case’s final resolution will further hamper the search for the truth and the delivery of any appropriate relief, and it will also prolong the agony that the lack of finality in this matter continues to cause Samantha Geimer. We all exhort all participants in this extended drama to place the integrity of the criminal justice system above the desire to punish any one individual, whether for his offense or his flight.”
It has been four years since this opinion was issued. Additional allegations that have been made and facts that have been revealed since the original proceedings have raised new questions and concerns about the treatment of this case in the years since 1977. These include the recent statements and behavior of David Wells, recent revelations about Judge Fidler’s handing of the case (*please see link below) and Steven Cooley’s hostile attitude towards myself and the California Victims’ Bill of Rights.
I understand that your office has pressing and more current matters on which to commit its resources, but if not now, when? The answer will be never, as eventually the original participants in the matter will not be available to testify. I have been the lonely voice of a woman and a victim in a choir of the voices of powerful men and their individual agendas. I ask only that you find the truth, that you demonstrate the integrity of the Los Angeles District Attorneys’ Office and seek that justice not be delayed or denied any further.
Thank you for your kind consideration.
No where does she state she was harmed by Polanski. No where does she state about her pain and anguish at what Polanski “did to her”. She cites, at her discretion, her “victimhood” but never once admits to her own culpability in this travesty of justice. But then that would mean she’d have to admit to having lied under oath, and then admit that it was all a honey trap set up by her mother and her to “reel in the big one”. She says that she wants truth, but she refuses to admit hers. But there again she is not acting like a victim. If she were a victim, she wouldn’t be writing letters in support of Polanski, rather ones that ask for his head on a platter. I know for me had I been able to prosecute my rapist, I would have without asking for leniency. I’d be asking for his head on a platter because that’s what real rape victims do. We don’t slobber all over ourselves, whetted with excitement to be in the news yet again with a whale of a tale. We don’t want our rapists to be able to walk away scott free for having raped us. We want justice, and that is the one thing that Samantha Geimer is not asking for. Some will say, “Oh, it’s because she’s forgiven him….” Forgiven what? What did he do to her other than give her that one thing she wanted: Fame and a career. And that career is as an actress who plays her part well. Didn’t she say in her tome the two of them were, “playing our parts”? If anyone can’t read into that what actually happened then I feel for you. I truly do. And for those like Numby who can’t seem to grasp that Polanski is not their whipping boy. Numby even claimed to have exercised great restraint when a 15 year-old girl allegedly threw herself at him. He acts like Geimer in a way, that he’s the best gift to ever have existed. But then both Numby and Geimer have huge egos that need to be stroked daily…if not hourly. And like Numby’s new idol, President Pussy Grabber himself, he is completely too stupid to realize that he’s not god’s gift to anyone or anything…including himself.
So Numby if you read this…. Glad you did, but not for the reasons you think.